Mixed Methods

Bazeley, P. (2006). The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analyses. Research in the Schools, 13 (1), 64-74.

Bryant, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113.

Cameron, R. (2009). A sequential mixed model research design: Design, analytical and display issues. [Article]. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 140-152.

Collins, K. M. T., & O’Cathain, A. (2009). Introduction: Ten points about mixed methods research to be considered by the novice researcher. [Article]. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 2-7.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research(2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutmann, M.L., and Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research design. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, John et al (1996). Integrated qualitative and quantitative research: Epistemology, history, and designs. In J.C. Smart (Ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp. 90-136). 2. New York: Agathon.

Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, Mixed Methods, and Paradigm Dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419-427.

Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2012). An applied reference guide to research design: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Freshwater, D. (2007). Reading mixed methods research: Contexts for criticism. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 134-146.

Greene, J.C. (2006). Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 93-99.

Greene, J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Greene, J.C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7-22.

Greene, J.C., Benjamin, L., and Goodyear, L. (2001). The merits of mixing methods in evaluation. Evaluation, 7(1), 25-44.

Halcomb, E. J., & Andrew, S. (2009). Practical considerations for higher degree research students undertaking mixed methods projects. [Article]. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 153-162.

Hall, J., & Ryan, K. (2011). Educational Accountability: A Qualitatively Driven Mixed-Methods Approach. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(1), 105-115.

Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Emerging Methodologies and Methods Practices in the Field of Mixed Methods Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 415-418.

Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press.

Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Qualitative Approaches to Mixed Methods Practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 455-468.

Hitchcock, J. H., Nastasi, B. K., & Summerville, M. (2010). Single-case designs and qualitative methods: Applying a mixed methods research perspective. [Article]. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 23(2), 49-58.

House, E.R. (1994). Integrating the quantitative and qualitative. In C.S. Reichardt and S.F. Rallis (eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives. New Directions for Program Evaluation no. 61 (pp.13-22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Howe, K.R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis, or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10-16.

Howe, Ken (2004). A critique of experimentation. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (1), 42-61.

Johnson, R.B., and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9-25.

Maudsley, G. (2011). Mixing it but not mixed-up: Mixed methods research in medical education (a critical narrative review). [Article]. Medical Teacher, 33(2), e92-e104. doi: 10.3109/0142159x.2011.542523

Maxwell, J.A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.

Mertens, D. (2010). Transformative Mixed Methods Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469-474.

Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Miller, S. I., & Fredericks, M. (2006). Mixed-Methods and Evaluation Research: Trends and Issues. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 567-579.

Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., and Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and Integration: processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1) 45-59.

Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.

Morse, J. (2010). Simultaneous and Sequential Qualitative Mixed Method Designs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 483-491.

Niglas, K. (2009). How the novice researcher can make sense of mixed methods designs. [Article]. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 34-46.

McCall, Leslie (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771-1800.

O’Byrne, P. (2007). The advantages and disadvantages of mixing methods: An analysis of combining traditional and autoethnographic approaches. [Article]. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1381-1391.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281-316.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Dickinson, W. B. (2008). Mixed methods analysis and information visualization: Graphical display for effective communication of research results. The Qualitative Report, 13(2), 204-225.

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., and Johnson, R.B. (2006). The validity issues in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. [Article]. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 114-139.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474-498.

Padgett, D. (2012). Qualitative and mixed methods in public health. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Plowright, D. (2011). Using mixed methods: frameworks for an integrated methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Pole, K. (2007). Mixed method designs: A review of strategies for blending quantitative and qualitative methodologies. [Article]. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 20(4), 35-38.

Robinson, P. (2010). Conclusion: On hammers, nails and building sites – Teaching mixed methods. [Article]. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(1), 66-72. doi: 10.5172/mra.2010.4.1.066

Salehi, K., & Golafshani, N. (2010). Commentary: Using mixed methods in research studies: An opportunity with its challenges. [Article]. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 186-191. doi: 10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.186

Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux: The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 321-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Simpson, S. H. (2011). Demystifying the research process: Mixed methods. [Article]. Pediatric Nursing, 37(1), 28-29.

Smith, M.L. (1994). Qualitative plus/versus quantitative: The last word. In C.S. Reichardt and S.F. Rallis (eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives. New Directions for Program Evaluation no. 61 (pp.37-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Smith, M.L. (1997). Mixing and matching: Methods and models. In J.C. Greene and V.J. Caracelli (eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New Directions for Evaluation no. 74 (pp. 73-85). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Smith, M.L. (2006). Multiple methodology in education research. In J.L. Green, G. Camilli, and P.B. Elmore (eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 457-475). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sosulski, M.R., and Lawrence, C. (2008). Mixing methods for full-strength results. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(2), 121-148.

Suri, Harsh & Clarke, David (2009). Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 395-430.

Symonds, J. E., & Gorard, S. (2010). Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. [Article]. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(2), 121-136. doi: 10.1080/09500790.2010.483514

Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010) SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 12-28.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Thomas, K. (2006). Compounding mixed-methods problems in frame analysis through comparative research. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 61-76.

Voils, C. I., Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Hasselblad, V. (2008). Making Sense of Qualitative and Quantitative Findings in Mixed Research Synthesis Studies. Field Methods, 20(1), 3-25.

von Zweck, C., Paterson, M., & Pentland, W. (2008). The use of hermeneutics in a mixed methods design. The Qualitative Report, 13(1), 116-134.

Yanchar, Stephen C. & Williams, David D. (2006). Reconsidering the Compatibility Thesis and Eclecticism: Five Proposed Guidelines for Method Use. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 3-12.