Ali-Khan, C. (2011). Seeing what we mean: visual knowledge and critical epistemology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(3), 303-322.
Allen, J., Fabregas, V., Hankins, K. H., Hull, G., Labbo, L., Lawson, H. S., Michalove, B., Piazza, S., Piha, C., Sprague, L., Townsend, S., & Urdanivia-English, C. (2002). PhOLKS Lore: Learning from photographs, families and children. Language Arts, 79(4), 32-42.
Allen, J. & Labbo, L. (2001). Giving it a Second Thought: Making Culturally Engaged Teaching Culturally Engaging. Language Arts, 79(1), 40-52.
Ball, M. S. & Smith, G. W. H. (1992). Analyzing visual data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Barthes, R. (1996). Camera Lucida: Reflections on photograph. New York: Hill and Wang.
Becker, H. S. (1978). Do photographs tell the truth? After Image, 5, 9-13.
Becker, H. S. (1986). Doing things together: Selected papers. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Press.
Birdwhistell, Ray L. (1952). Introduction to Kinesics. Louisville, Ky.: University of Louisville Press.
Birdwhistell, Ray L. (1970). Kinesics and Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Burke, D., & Evans, J. (2011). Embracing the creative: the role of photo novella in qualitative nursing research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(2), 164-177.
Byers, Paul. (1964). Still Photography in the Systematic Recording and Analysis of Behavioral Data. Human Organization 23. 78–84.
Byers, Paul. (1966). Cameras Don’t Take Pictures. Columbia University Forum IX 1: 27–31.
Byers, Paul, and Happie Byers. (1972). Noverbal Communication and the Education of Children. In Functions of Language in the Classroom, C. Cazden, V. John, D. Hymes, eds. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Cappello, M. (2001). Photography as a data generation tool for qualitative inquiry in education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
Clark, C. D. (1999). The autodriven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children’s experience. Visual Sociology, 14, 39-50.
Cole, R. & Nixon, N. (1998). School. New York: Little, Brown.
Collier, George, and Evon Z. Vogt. (1965). Aerial Photographs and Computers in the Analysis of Zinacanteco Demography and Land Tenure. Paper presented at the Sixty-fourth Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Denver (mimeographed).
Collier, John, Jr. (1957). Photography in Anthropology: A Report on Two Experiments. American Anthropologist. 59: 843–859.
Collier, J. & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Dabbs, J. M. (1982). Making things visible. In Van Maanen, J., Dabbs, J. M., & Faulkner, R. (eds.). Varieties of qualitative research (pp. 31-64). London: Sage.
Denzin, N. (1989). The research act (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dicks, B., Soyinka, B., & Coffey, A. (2006). Multimodal ethnography. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 77-96.
Emmison, M., & Smith, P. (2000). Researching the visual: Images, objects, contexts and interactions in social and cultural inquiry. London: Sage.
Galman, S. (2009). The truthful messenger: visual methods and representation in qualitative research in education. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 197-217.
Harper, D. (1989). Visual sociology: Expanding sociological vision. In G. Bank et. al. (eds.). New technologies in sociology: Practical application in research and work (pp. 81-97). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Harper, D. (1994). On the authority of the image: Visual methods at the crossroads. In Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 403-12). London: Sage.
Harper, D. (1998) An argument for visual sociology. In Prosser, J. (ed) Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer Press, 24-41.
Harper, D. (2000). Reimagining visual methods: Galileo to Neuromancer. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 717-732). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Harper, D. (2008). What’s new visually? In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 185-204). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: a relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525-542.
Kaufmann, J. J. (2011). Heteronarrative analysis: examining online photographic narratives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(1), 7-26.
Keller, C., Fleury, J., Perez, A., Ainsworth, B., & Vaughan, L. (2008). Using Visual Methods to Uncover Context. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3), 428-436.
Kingsley, J. (2009). Visual methodology in classroom inquiry: Enhancing complementary qualitative research designs. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 55(4), 534-548.
Konecki, K. (2009). Teaching visual grounded theory. Qualitative Sociology Review, 5(3), 64-92.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Lightfoot, A. (1998). With full regard for race: Portrait of an educational process. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard University.
Margolis, E., & Pauwels, L. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Moon, B. M. (2011). Applied concept mapping: capturing, analyzing, and organizing knowledge. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Orellana, M. (1999). Space and place in an urban landscape: Learning from children’s views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology, 14, 73-89.
Pink, S. (2001). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research. London: Sage.
Pink, S. (2004). Visual methods. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 391-406). London: Sage.
Pink, S. (2006). The future of visual anthropology: Engaging the senses. London: Routledge.
Pink, S. (2012). Advances in visual methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Preskill, H. (1995). The use of photography in evaluating school culture. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(2), 183-193.
Prosser, J. (Ed.). (1998). Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer Press.
Rose, G. (2011). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sheridan, J., Chamberlain, K., & Dupuis, A. (2011). Timelining: visualizing experience. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 552-569.
Silver, C., & Patashnick, J. (2011). Finding fidelity: Advancing audiovisual analysis using software. [Article]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), 1-33.
Slone, D. J. (2009). Visualizing qualitative information. The Qualitative Report, 14(3), 489-497.
Spencer, S. (2011). Visual research methods in the social sciences: awakening visions. New York: Routledge.
Stanczak, G. C. (Ed.). (2007). Visual research methods: Image, society, and representation. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Szto, P., Furman, R., & Langer, C. (2005). Poetry and Photography: An Exploration into Expressive/Creative Qualitative Research. [Article]. Qualitative Social Work, 4(2), 135-156. doi: 10.1177/1473325005052390
Templin, P. A. (1982). Still photography in evaluation. In N. L. Smith (ed.). Communication strategies in evaluation (pp. 121-175). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Theron, L. (2011). Picturing research: drawing as visual methodology. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of visual analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wagner, J. (Ed.). (1979). Images of information. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Wagner, J. (2007). Observing culture and social life: Documentary photography, fieldwork, and social research In G. C. Stanczak (Ed.), Visual research methods: Image, society, and representation (pp. 23-60). Los Angeles: Sage.
Wheeldon, J., & Ahlberg, M. K. (2011). Visualizing social science research: maps, methods, & meaning. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Websites:
QualPage 